Our brains are keen to stick to linear lines of logic – A happening before B, and therefore A being a cause – yet, for many people, this order of occurrence is enough proof that the former either provoked or wholly resulted in B. This intuitive way of thinking is causes us to accept that 2 precedes 3, 4 follows 3, and 1 begins the whole process – what is seemingly a sensible thing to believe in theory, but the real world cannot be pigeon holed so easily.
Events interrelate and seemingly important happenings can have no relation to overall results, and equally overlooked factors can have drastic effects in the long run. Yet the natural inclination to assign cause and effect is an over powering one, and it forces us into hasty decisions. We have all made hideously premature judgements that we have later regretted or let skew future decisions through our unfounded assumptions.
I recently had one of these occurrences made clear to me by a friend; Dom (see beloew) drew my attention to the threat of a double dip recession facing the UK economy. One could easily assume that, as the government ought to have good control of our economy, this is wholly their doing, but one must approach these things with a level head. As one young Tim Hoyland did, wading in to give some reasonable perspective. I then followed up with some kind of weak and disappointingly unfunny attempt at satire that merely showed my ineptitude. I’ll not be expecting a phone call from Ian Hislop for a regular article in Private Eye.
Nevertheless, this shows exactly how we are programmed to accept a given series of events, provided we have a facilitator and a result. We can be worryingly callous with the middle bit.
These causal relationships are formed and embedded into our minds by anyone seeking to direct our thinking. I just finished A History of the World in Ten and a Half Chapters (well worth a read if you’re looking) which discusses the uncertainty of historical storytelling, a point that is seemingly evident here. A healthy dose of perspective in approaching any issue is a sensible route to take, I feel.
Whilst allowing ourselves a reasonable level of scepticism, this does mean we unsettle the earth beneath our feet; by raising suspicions about the building blocks of society, we raise questions about our own identity. Whether you chose to rebel against it or conform wholly to the norms of society, this predetermined entity needs to have a strong base for you to either stand on or push against.
As these suspicions grow, we are forced into only looking to the present for reassurance of what is real, the past and future steeped in doubt (at least until time travel is possible, so I’ll keep my eyes on result from CERN) and we are left with only the material present to reassure ourselves of what has not been skewed by middle men.
Approach everyday stories given to us can show how easily we can be led. Something, I’m sure, is put some constantly to the evils of the media, as they try to corrupt our minds and create a world of greed-driven morons, totally inept of thinking without the aid of a TV or Google. What is often forgotten, though, is that people enjoy playing into the hands of the media, we love to be told a story: we yearn for someone to spin a yarn to us, to play with our emotions and to fool us. The media is there to entertain us, and if it begins to change us, we have the control and inclination to stop consuming, we are not mindless drones.
Examples of this direction of emotions are everywhere, but I turn to the documentary series Frozen Planet that has captivated the country every Wednesday for the past few weeks.
A polar bear is as easily shown to be a killer, a ball of pure muscle designed to rip apart seals and other small animals in order to sustain its high octane life of hunting. Just as easily, though, this animal can be shown to be a gentle bear, its white coat luring us to stroke it and its long snout and almost canine features makes it lovable to the dog-lovers amongst us.
When either side of this coin is shown we willingly forget the other, not because David Attenborough has hoodwinked us as a part of his dastardly plan, but because we understand that the world is an infinitely complex place and we cannot reasonably expect to fathom it all at once.
Equally, we are complicated beings – our emotions are a finely tuned set of chemicals and pulses, which are manipulated with ease by anyone who knows how to tell a story. It is our prerogative, as owners and users of these emotions to feel them, to experience the full range of things we can, and similarly, we also wish to see all the things that can spark these emotions – keen to partake in the confusing world, and taking ourselves away from the motionless dullards some people seem to think media-consumers are.
It is imperative that we experience things, that we delve into the unknown and see where things start, understand how they develop and revel in their results. We are not primitive beings as part of a complex web of life; we are hosts of one of the most complex entities in the known universe – the human brain. A tool that is moulded by complex societies, formed by complex developments of social and biological evolution, caused by incredibly intricate yet bafflingly simply physics and chemistry .
It is these systems of science and creation – the wonderful concepts so carefully created and monitored for accuracy – that can explain the most inexplicable occurrences around us. The fanciful spiritualists and religionists can keep their scriptures, their tarot cards and their flights of fancy, I will happily bask in glory of logic and reason and allow myself.
I can see why people might want to leave out the middle stage of logic and just skip from cause to effect, but it is so much more rewarding and enchanting to discover the rhyme and reason behind all the world’s processes. The intricacies of the universe will continue to baffle humanity forever, but what will never go away is that longing to not be baffled, stage 2 and 3 may never be discovered, but looking for them is cause enough for celebration.
